Its beyond me to explain why so much of Christianity is so far off what Jesus of Nazareth actually taught. And he wasn’t even vague or unclear in any way. This passage is a prime example: here Jesus is clearly teaching the disciples a lesson in tolerance. He couldn’t have been more clear when he said: Whoever is not against us is for us.
And yet, much of conservative Christianity, and perhaps this is also true for other religions, are doing the exact opposite of what Jesus was teaching. They draw a line in the sand defining them and us in very strict and judgmental ways. They are turning Jesus statement around, saying: if youre not for me, you are against me. I wonder if the disciples would agree with her when she says, unless you come to my church, or a church that is very similar to my church, and unless you believe the way I do (by which they usually mean the 5 fundamentals of Christianity), you cant be a true believer.
Even if you go to your church regularly, even if you are a pastor of such a church, even if you are doing good things in the world, even if you sing the same songs, etc.
Note how Jesus counters the disciples Us vs. Them language. The disciples said: we stopped him cause he was not one of us.
There it is, the us vs. them concept that is the cause for racism, sexism, heterosexism, unhealthy nationalism and racial ethnic supremacy attitudes. If we could only stop that language, if we could only stop seeing the world in terms of us vs. them, we would actually have a chance to get along.
Where does this concept even come from? How can it be explained? One psychologist explains it like this:
People who do not have a positive sense of self, or if they have low or damaged self esteem, or if they feel insecure, then the feeling of belonging to a group that they feel is superior or secure would be helpful to their sense of self esteem. They become intolerant and insensitive to the other groups.
Perhaps, those Christians who see the world in terms of us vs. them language, dont really feel secure in their spiritual identity. Perhaps they derive their sense of purpose and identity form a specific faith group that teaches some sort of superiority over and against other groups. Which becomes a problem unless that faith is following Jesus Christ?
This also fits perfectly with the words of the Dalai Lama who said: compassion and tolerance are not a sign of weakness, but a sign of strength.
Back to our text, when the disciples bring up the other believer, the one who operated outside of their circle, Jesus said: whoever is not against us, is for us. In the Greek its even clearer: the word for for is hyper which also carries the connotation of above us and on behalf of us, or with us
So, Jesus could actually be interpreted to have said: whoever is not against us is one of us.
Thats a fascinating concept in which the only way people find themselves outside of Gods kingdom is if they exclude themselves. We are not supposed to be exclusive or to exclude anybody, we are supposed to include everybody!
But even if you find this interpretation too far-fetched, at the very least, Jesus was asking his disciples to tolerate those who are not part of our inner circle of faith. We are supposed to accept them and not stop them. There simply is no place in Gods kingdom for the them vs. us language, there is no place for hate speech, there is no place for intolerance.
If we could only understand this teaching and put it into practice. World peace would be this much closer. So, let it begin with us. We can live Jesus principle of tolerance. And my prediction is that as we do, we will have more friends, a wider network of people from all walks, and we will be able to open ourselves up to a richer wisdom and spiritual life. Especially a life that others say I want to be like them. Amen.